Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
That is, x ∈ lim sup X n if and only if there exists a subsequence (X n k) of (X n) such that x ∈ X n k for all k. lim inf X n consists of elements of X which belong to X n for all except finitely many n (i.e., for cofinitely many n). That is, x ∈ lim inf X n if and only if there exists some m > 0 such that x ∈ X n for all n > m.
Hence, one can easily see that uniform convergence is a stronger property than pointwise convergence: the existence of uniform limit implies the existence and equality of pointwise limit: If x n , m → y m {\displaystyle x_{n,m}\to y_{m}} uniformly, then x n , m → y m {\displaystyle x_{n,m}\to y_{m}} pointwise.
On the other hand, if X is the domain of a function f(x) and if the limit as n approaches infinity of f(x n) is L for every arbitrary sequence of points {x n} in X − x 0 which converges to x 0, then the limit of the function f(x) as x approaches x 0 is equal to L. [11] One such sequence would be {x 0 + 1/n}.
Examples abound, one of the simplest being that for a double sequence a m,n: it is not necessarily the case that the operations of taking the limits as m → ∞ and as n → ∞ can be freely interchanged. [4] For example take a m,n = 2 m − n. in which taking the limit first with respect to n gives 0, and with respect to m gives ∞.
In mathematics, the limit of a sequence of sets,, … (subsets of a common set ) is a set whose elements are determined by the sequence in either of two equivalent ways: (1) by upper and lower bounds on the sequence that converge monotonically to the same set (analogous to convergence of real-valued sequences) and (2) by convergence of a sequence of indicator functions which are themselves ...
In case 2 the assumption that f(x) diverges to infinity was not used within the proof. This means that if |g(x)| diverges to infinity as x approaches c and both f and g satisfy the hypotheses of L'Hôpital's rule, then no additional assumption is needed about the limit of f(x): It could even be the case that the limit of f(x) does not exist. In ...
One can think of limit computable functions as those admitting an eventually correct computable guessing procedure at their true value. A set is limit computable just when its characteristic function is limit computable. If the sequence is uniformly computable relative to D, then the function is limit computable in D.
The function () = + (), where denotes the sign function, has a left limit of , a right limit of +, and a function value of at the point =. In calculus, a one-sided limit refers to either one of the two limits of a function of a real variable as approaches a specified point either from the left or from the right.